Title Authors Year SETAC Poster or Presentation
Hughes & Carnall 2019_GeoPEARL UK_SETAC Helsinki Poster J. Carnall, G. Hughes 2019  
Is that an Effect? The Importance of Using All Relevant Data in Mesocosm Studies Ashford et al. 2018  
Developing Methods to Determine Aquatic Invertebrate Behavioural Endpoints for Regulatory Ecotoxicology Studies Brooks et al. 2018  
Keeping it Real: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Aquatic Risk Assessment Brooks et al. 2018  
An Updated Version of SEPA BathAuto Tool for Assessing Anti-parasitic Chemical Treatments in Marine Cage Fish Farms Carnall et al. 2018  
Selecting Application Dates for UK Higher Tier Drainflow Modelling: Comparing the Focus and CRD Pesticide Application Timing Rule Carnall et al. 2018  
Considering Diffuse Urban and Agricultural Sources of Pesticides at the Landscape and Catchment Scale Hughes et al. 2018  
Contextualising Statistically Significant Differences Observed in Mesocosm Studies Using Historical Control Data Joyce et al.  2018  
Manure Transportation in Europe - Consideration for Spatially Distributed Modelling of Veterinary Medicines McMillan 2018  
Plant Recovery: A Mesocosm Perspective Pickering at al. 2018  
Use of Higher-Tier Laboratory Testing in Mesocosm Studies Ashford et al. 2017  
Deriving Ecologically Relevant Endpoints for Wild Mammal Risk Assessment Brooks et al. 2017  
The 'So What' Question: When is an Effect Actually an Effect? Brooks 2017  
Environmental Exposure Following the Use of Veterinary Medicinal Products As Bath Treatments - An Extended Version of the MLA Model Carnall et al. 2017  
Challenges in Exposure Modelling of Fish Veterinary Medicines Ericher 2017  
The Use of Recovery Endpoints in Aquatic Risk Assessments: What About Isolated Waterbodies? Hackett et al. 2017  
Modelling Breeding Success in Birds Potentially Exposed to Treated Seed Lawrence et al.  2017  
Geographical Scenarios to Assess Environmental Risk of Veterinary Medicines in Europe McMillan and Hughes 2017  
Modelling and Monitoring of Pesticides Fate and Exposure in a Regulatory Context Pepper et al. 2017  
Practical Experience of MDD Analysis for Mesocosm Studies: Challenges for Reliable Endpoints from Tricky Taxa Schuster et al. 2017  
Reflections On Bird And Mammal Risk Assessment: Past, Present and Future Brooks et al. 2016  
Example of a Conceptual Garden Scenario and Potential for Ecosystem Services and Ecological Modelling to Support the Regulatory Process Ericher 2016  
Outdoor Use of Biocidal Products - Considering Contaminated Rainwater Pathways in the Urban Context and Potential for Harmonisation Ericher 2016  
Culturing and Testing Early Life-History Stage Larvae of Chaoborus crystallinus and Cloeon dipterum Howells et al.  2016  
Eliminating Stressors in Laboratory Tests with Corixidae Joyce and Taylor 2016  
   Can We Combine Data From Avian Reproduction Studies On Different Test Species To Improve Risk Assessments? Lawrence 2016  
   Results and Interpretation of a Field Scale Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification Monitoring Programme Lawrence et al. 2016  
VSmod - A Comparison with Field Derived Values of Runoff Removal Efficiency Under Controlled Conditions Pepper et al. 2016  
Culturing and Testing Early Life History Stage Larvae of Asellus aquaticus, Crangonyx pseudogracilisand Lymnaea stagnalis Radford et al.  2016  
  Arenas Sanchez et al. 2015  
Minimum Detectable Differences (MDD’s) in Mesocosm Studies: The Importance of Pre-treatment Management and Appropriate Sampling Techniques for Insecticides Blackey et al.  2015  
Use of Dehusking in Plant Protection Products on Product Risk Assessment for Birds & Mammals Hackett and Lawrence 2015  
Development of a UK Higher Tier Groundwater Environmental Risk Assessment for Pesticides Hughes 2015  
An Updated Landuse Data Set for Use in European Regulatory Environmental Risk Assessments Hughes and Lyons 2015  
Assessing Environmental Risk of Co-formulants Used in Plant Protection Products Under REACH - A Case Study of When a Chemical Use Doesn't Fit the Standard Assessment Framework McMillan et al. 2015  
The Minimum Detectable Difference (2): Appropriate Experimental Design and Endpoint Selection for Algae in Mesocosm Studies Pickering et al. 2015  
UK Water Industry Project DW14B207 Phase 1 - Pesticide Risk Mapping and Catchment Interventions  Hughes, G.O., Lyons, H., Pepper, T., Twining, S. et al 2015  
Catchment Scale Modelling to Refine FOCUS Scenario Based Risk Estimates of Selected Veterinary Medicines in Drinking Water Hughes et al.  2014  
Sensitivity Analysis of Key Environmental Fate Parameters Used in PETRORISK Version 6.02 for the Environmental Risk Assessment of Petroleum Substances McMillan 2014  
Addressing Mesocosm Data Requirements In The New EFSA Aquatic Guidance Document Taylor and Bennett 2014  
Sloped Mesocosms: A New Design to Evaluate Macrophyte Community Effects Walton 2014  
Laboratory Aquatic Invertebrate Single-Species Screening Studies Zivtins et al. 2014  
Predicting the impact of temporary crop covers on pesticide exposure using a modelling-based scenario approach (PS2252) Carnall, J. 2014  
Breeding success of birds exposed to treated seed (PS2373) Lawrence, A., and Crocker, J., Lyons, H. 2014  
Developments in Laboratory & In-Situ Invertebrate Bioassays for Use in Higher Tier Mesocosm Testing Bennett et al.  2013  
Breeding Success and Risk Assessments for Birds Exposed to Treated Seed Lawrence and Crocker  2013  
Development of a Chronic Lemna Assay to Support Regulatory Endpoints from Mesocosm Studies with Herbicides Priestly et al. 2013  
New Developments in Species Selection for Mesocosm Testing with Herbicides: Recent Experience and Recommendations Walton et al.  2013  
Drainflow risk communication (PS2245)   Hughes, G.O. 2013  
Breeding success of birds exposed to treated seed (PS2373) Lawrence, A., and Crocker, J. 2013  
Quantifying the efficiency of vegetative buffers in reducing pesticide runoff losses – scenario development and field methodology  Pepper, T., Hughes, G.O. 2013  
   Considerations For Design and Statistical Interpretation of Ecotoxicological Community Studies Lawrence et al. 2012  
   Ecological Context of Long-Term Avian Risk Assessments: UK Spring Seed Treatment Example Lawrence et al. 2012  
Novel Approaches for Static Mesocosm Studies with Herbicides: Linking Modelled Exposure with the Reality of Flowing Water and Other Challenges Taylor and Weyman 2012  
New Developments in Mesocosm Testing with Herbicides: Recent Experience and Recommendations Taylor et al.  2012  
Horticultural crops grown using temporary covers and plastic mulches: effects on pesticide use, fate and exposure (PS2246) Carnall, J. 2012  
Catchment based assessments of water quality in support of policy implementation    Hughes, G.O. 2012  
Contextualising the risk to breeding birds from spring seed treatments: UK example Lawrence, A. 2012  
Assessing the temporal / seasonal changes in the ecology of untreated mesocosms and natural water bodies to inform the uncertainty associated with aquatic risk assessments of plant protection products (PS2339) Taylor, S. 2012  
Scoping study for refinements to runoff assessments (PS2243)  Brown, C.D., Hughes, G.O. 2011  
Impact of Minor Uses: Development of the CRD Minor Uses Screening Tool (PS2238)   Hughes, G.O. 2011  
Do aquatic mesocosms represent real edge of field water bodies in the UK? (PS2339)  Taylor, S., Blake, N. 2011  
   Non-Target Arthropods: Recovery and Representivity Lawrence and Brown 2010  
Improving Emission Estimates of Ingredients Used in Home and Personal Care Products for Use in EU Risk Assessments Price et al.  2010  
Can scale of use be used in aquatic risk assessments? Hughes, G.O. 2010  
NTA Recovery (PS2355); NTA representivity (PS2356); ESCORT 3 meeting report Lawrence, A., Brown, K. 2010  
PS2339: Do aquatic mesocosms represent real edge-of-field water bodies in the UK? Taylor, S., Lawrence, A., Blake, N., Hughes, G.O. 2010  
   Bird and Mammal Reproductive Assessments: Broods at Risk Lawrence 2009  
Do Aquatic Mesocosms Represent Real Edge-of-field Water Bodies in the UK? Taylor and Blake 2009  
Surface runoff (PS2233) Hughes, G.O., Hollis, J., Brown, C., Ramwell, C. 2009  
PS2339: Do aquatic mesocosms represent real edge-of-field water bodies in the UK? Lawrence, A., Taylor, S., Blake, N., Hughes, G.O. 2009  
Development of a Surface Run-off Vulnerability Index Hughes et al. 2008  
   An Alternative Method for Estimating Risk to NTA's Lawrence and Miles 2008  
Do Aquatic Mesocosms Represent Real Edge of Field Water Bodies in the UK? Outline of a Field Sampling Programme Taylor et al.  2008  
Surface runoff (PS2233) Hughes, G.O. 2008  
PS2339: Assessing the temporal and seasonal changes in the ecology of untreated mesocosms and natural water bodies Lawrence, A. 2008  
Climate Change Impacts on Environmental Risk Assessments - A Synthesis Hughes and Price 2007  
Aquatic Macrophytes - Is There a Need for Additional Test Species? Kroos et al. 2007  
A Database of Generic Information to aid the Interpretation of NTA Field Studies Lawrence 2007  
    An Alternative Method for the Estimation of Arthropod Exposure to Pesticides Lawrence 2007  
Software Tools to Aid Interpretation of Surface Water Exposure Assessment Ford and Price 2006  
Variability and Uncertainty in Arthropod Exposure to Pesticide Drift in Crop and Off-Crop Areas Lawrence and Arnold 2006  
Modifying Environmental Risk Assessments: A Software Solution for Document Management Mason et al. 2006  
Linking the Run-off Model PRZM with a GIS Database to Determine Variability in Surface Water Exposure Price et al. 2006  
GIS Tools: Field Study Design and Aquatic Risk Assessments Price et al.  2006  
WEBFRAM 4, Objective 2: Variability and uncertainty in exposure estimates to above ground arthropods Lawrence, A. 2006  
Characterisation & Field Evaluation of Sheep Dip Chemical Disposal Arnold et al. 2005  
Zooplankton Community Responses to a Toxic Perturbation in a Mature Lentic Mesocosm Blake et al. 2005  
Monitoring of Farm-scale Bioremediation Systems for Pesticide Handling/Washdown Areas Mason et al. 2005  
The Use of FOCUS PEARL in an Automated Spatial Exposure Modelling Assessment for the Prediction of Isoproturon Concentrations in Groundwater Price et al. 2005  
FOCUS Surface Water Modelling Using Separate Water and Sediment Degradation Values Compared with Using a Total System Dissipation Value Price et al.  2005  
Copyright 2019 RSK ADAS Ltd.